Who it's for
Whatever your shape, you have to show where each figure came from.
One entity, one payroll, one person accountable when LHDN asks. The working behind every line — not a spreadsheet defended from memory.
Employees move between companies, and year-to-date figures follow the person, not the payroll. A mid-year transfer is a statement, not a re-entry exercise.
Filing on behalf of clients means defending someone else's numbers to a regulator. The answer to a query is a citation, not a reconstruction.
Payroll is where compilations go wrong: figures arrive with no working. Here they arrive with it.
None of these is quite you?
Tell us how your entities and your people actually line up.
Yes. The employment record spans entities, which is what makes a mid-year transfer between two of your own companies a statement about a person — not a termination plus a new hire with re-entered year-to-date.
That is exactly what the year-to-date working is for. Every month has to add up whichever company paid it, and a month that does not is named, not assumed to be zero.
No. PEOPLE works out and files payroll, and exports to the accounts you already keep. Replacing your accounting system is not on the roadmap and would not make your payroll any easier to defend.
You state an opening balance and the runs a previous provider made. PEOPLE derives year-to-date from that plus its own runs, and refuses to compute until every month in the window is accounted for.
Every line PEOPLE produces carries the instrument that sets it and the date that instrument took effect.